AHURI BRIEF

Creating places that support wellbeing and community participation

Place based approaches and community engagement: facilitating healthy, liveable, walkable, lively and inclusive cities

27 July 2020

Analysis of current and previous Australian urban policy frameworks identified a number of themes relating to the structure of Australian cities and desired social outcomes. This Brief investigates urban policies that have used place-based approaches with liveability, community wellbeing and healthy places as stated objectives, and reinforce the role of active community engagement.

Urban policies do not explicitly define what constitutes a ‘city’. Instead metropolitan planning strategies and infrastructure reports refer to place-based approaches at varying spatial scales including inner cities, the greater metropolitan areas of Australia’s capital cities, regions (such as South-East Queensland) and areas contained within these. The notion of place is strongly tied to concentrating economic activities and planning for the needs of residents within cities.

Place-based approaches

Metropolitan planning strategies operate at varying scales and scopes. Some plans focus on the overarching sense of the future needs of the city, whereas others work at very small spatial units.

The concept of a 20 or 30 minute neighbourhood is an example of a place-based approach in which an urban policy engages spatially. A key objective of the Greater Sydney Region Plan: A Metropolis of Three Cities is to create a 30 minute city, in which most residents can travel to a metropolitan centre to access employment and services within 30 minutes of leaving home.

20 minute city

AHURI research evaluated urban renewal programs in Australia on a neighbourhood scale, finding that these place-based interventions have the potential to provide greater social equity for disadvantaged communities and help allocate resources more efficiently. By facilitating walkable, lively and healthy neighbourhoods, planning strategies aim to connect local communities more closely and enhance social cohesion. Yet, not all planning strategies clearly articulate place-based concepts and the way they are to be implemented. Rather, spatial outcomes are pitched at a conceptual level, with operational details left to local government authorities.

Urban policies propose investments in certain urban areas by identifying priority places for investment and through collaborative processes develop location specific strategies. Focusing on selected urban areas is seen as fundamental to achieving better urban design and place-making outcomes. For example, Infrastructure Victoria refers to several employment centres throughout metropolitan Melbourne to facilitate urban consolidation and bring people closer to their employment.

Liveability

Liveable communities are ‘safe, socially cohesive and inclusive, and environmentally sustainable. They have affordable housing that is linked to employment; education; shops and services; public open space; and social, cultural and recreational opportunities’. Liveability is shaped by the built environment. Providing green spaces and opportunities for active transport or social interaction are some examples of how ‘liveability’ might be delivered, yet how these outcomes can be achieved is rarely elaborated in planning strategies. There is a heightened awareness of the importance of active transport options, and green spaces in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. AHURI research found that the use of mixed tenure, mixed use and mixed dwelling types may all contribute significantly to attempts to improve liveability, as well as de-stigmatise and rebalance the social profile of disadvantaged areas.

Victoria's 30-Year Infrastructure Strategy highlights the impacts of population growth and the role of infrastructure to support growing cities. The report refers to urban consolidation as the mechanism to ensure the liveability of Australia’s cities isn’t impacted. Within urban consolidation, infrastructure can play a key role in connecting people to jobs and supporting a healthy, educated workforce.

Health and community wellbeing

The wellbeing of communities and the development of liveable and healthy places are social outcomes sought through cities policies. The Western Australian strategy Perth and Peel@3.5million emphasises the need when planning new urban areas to encourage more active forms of transport to combat declining community health and increasing obesity. Furthermore, to enhance the health and wellbeing of the community, the strategy promotes the delivery of health infrastructure in proximity to residential developments and aims to optimise the use of existing facilities.

Community engagement

The process of community consultation is an important element of any city or regional specific plan. However, within metropolitan planning strategies there was little mention of how ongoing community engagement might be carried out as the strategies are delivered. AHURI research shows that engaging communities in early stages of projects and in policy development will lead to better outcomes, mitigating risks of community opposition.

Policy frameworks of Australian infrastructure agencies frequently highlight the importance of ongoing consultation with communities to identify infrastructure challenges and solutions. Infrastructure Australia emphasises the need for infrastructure projects to be well-coordinated, make use of new technology and support broader reforms have the potential to make communities more resilient and sustainable.

Policy implications

Australian cities would benefit from sustained and cohesive urban policies. A clearer articulation of the spatial scale of cities could help to clarify the scope and role of urban interventions. For example, Melbourne’s high score in global liveability rankings is widely promoted through urban policies, however, these do not necessarily take into account that this ranking only applies for the inner city of Melbourne and not the whole metropolitan area where middle and outer regions have, on average, lower urban liveability indices.

Aligning the delivery of social infrastructure and urban amenity better with urban consolidation and development strategies could facilitate more liveable and healthy places across metropolitan areas. Beyond articulating place-based approaches, urban policies should be outcomes-focused, and enable coordination between different government departments and agencies.

Changing consumption patterns and preferences in response to the COVID-19 pandemic also require consideration. This could entail encouraging active forms of transport in inner city urban renewal projects or establishing walkable neighbourhoods in urban growth areas. Planning strategies should go beyond engaging with communities in developing plans, to delivering and being measured against social outcomes that contribute to equitable, just and inclusive city policies.

Future lines of inquiry

  • How can urban form, built environment and social infrastructure support wellbeing and social inclusion?
  • How is liveability delivered and enhanced in different urban settings?
  • How do place-based approaches address spatial inequality and what are their effects on housing affordability and community outcomes?
  • What is the role of community engagement in shaping urban development, evaluating outcomes and implementing strategies?