Home Research The financing, delivery and effectiveness of programs to reduce homelessness Back to search Share Report Homelessness Housing assistance and policy The financing, delivery and effectiveness of programs to reduce homelessness Final Report No. 270 Date Published: 31 Oct 2016 Authors: Paul Flatau Kaylene Zaretzky Lisa Wood Darja Miscenko From the AHURI Inquiry: Inquiry into funding and delivery of programs to reduce homelessness This research provides evidence from the Australian Homelessness Funding and Delivery Survey of how services supporting those experiencing homelessness are funded and how different forms of funding and the level of funding impacts on the delivery of homelessness assistance. It is one of three reports to be released as part of an AHURI Inquiry into the funding and delivery of programs to reduce homelessness. The Australian Homelessness Funding and Delivery Survey found that the predominant source of funding of homelessness services in Australia is government funding. Recurrent government funding is estimated to account for 84.6 per cent of funding received by Specialist Homelessness Services (SHSs) and 60.6 per cent of funding for non-SHSs. SHSs are defined as those services that receive funding through targeted Commonwealth and state and territory government homelessness programs. The main non-government sources of funding used by homelessness services include donations, sponsorships and philanthropy and internally-generated revenue such as rent from supported accommodation services. Funding from government sources and from corporate grants and sponsorships has lower levels of flexibility and discretion than other sources of funding. The greatest level of flexibility and discretion in funding was found to be community donations, fundraising and large private donations. Key areas for policy development include greater certainty around future government funding of homelessness services; supportive measures to increase the level of non-government funding; and addressing the significant concerns reported by services with respect to the costs of funding diversification. Related reports The Inquiry into the funding of homelessness services in Australia Related reports February 2017 The funding and delivery of programs to reduce homelessness: the case study evidence April 2017 Inquiry into funding and delivery of programs to reduce homelessness December 2016 Safe and sound? How funding mix affects homelessness support for Indigenous Australians Full Publication Executive Summary DOI: 10.18408/ahuri-8209101 Published by: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited ISSN: 1834-7223 ISBN: 978-1-925334-33-3 Citation: Flatau, P., Zaretzky, K., Wood, L., and Miscenko, D. (2016) The financing, delivery and effectiveness of programs to reduce homelessness, AHURI Final Report No. 270, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited, Melbourne, https://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/final-reports/270, doi:10.18408/ahuri-8209101. RIS CITATION Flatau, Paul Zaretzky, Kaylene Wood, Lisa Miscenko, Darja
December 2016 Safe and sound? How funding mix affects homelessness support for Indigenous Australians